TruTV Counts Down “10 Dumb Sex & Commitment Scientific Studies”

TruTV Counts Down “10 Dumb Sex & Commitment Scientific Studies”

A fast look into my background on this site will confirm the point that I’m a massive follower of relationship researches. I’m mesmerized from the means we you will need to apply research to sex and really love, assured of 1 time to be able to give an explanation for mysterious ways of the center.

Some scientific studies offer interesting understanding of modern-day mating traditions, but some (otherwise most) are, as publisher Nick Nadel puts it, “forehead-slappingly obvious.” Nadel obtained a listing of 10 studies that many surely fall under the latter group. Here are a few in the features:

Dubious research no. 1: scientists at Radboud college of Nijmegen in Netherlands learned that men generally have trouble doing cognitive activities after socializing with members of the alternative sex. This means, Nadel claims, “interacting with ladies helps make males stupid.”

Nadel’s Take: “As apparent researches get, that one is up there with ‘people occasionally bend reality on line.'” It mustn’t get a research team to find out that men’s minds get distracted around ladies.

My views: i must side with Nadel with this one. It mustn’t appear as a surprise that men’s minds get a little addled around appealing females, and I guess that research on ladies brains would realize that they have been just as addled around attractive males.

Questionable Study number 2: According to the results of one of OkCupid’s many reports about OkTrends blog site, individuals who use Twitter each and every day have quicker interactions than those who do perhaps not.

Nadel’s Take: OkCupid doesn’t even believe their own findings. a spokesperson for all the website mentioned “sadly, we’ve got no chance to share with who is dumping which here; whether the Twitterati are far more frustrating or just a lot more flighty than everyone.” Put another way, there’s really no genuine proof that Twitter has actually anything to do aided by the amount of a relationship.

My personal mind: If folks responsible for the research are not even sure exactly what their unique results tend to be, they can be probably not worth spending much awareness of. The OkTrends studies are several enjoyable, but they are never the definitive term on all things dating.

Questionable learn # 3: the size of one’s ring finger relates to their elegance, per a team during the University of Geneva in Switzerland. The ratio that compares the length of men’s directory little finger to his ring-finger is called “2D:4D.”

Nadel’s simply take: the research promises that guys with extended band fingers have “rugged, caveman-like” confronts. “Right,” Nadel says, “because females usually aim for the caveman look. It isn’t really like a few of our hottest male superstars are non-threatening, baby-faced kinds or everything.”

My ideas: many reports examining female understanding of male elegance have found that women are attracted to different types of men during different stages regarding menstrual cycles. A female could, thus, be thinking about both the “baby-faced types” and also the “rugged cavemen” over the course of monthly. And also as much due to the fact fingers get, “correlation is not causation” – though there might be a connection between little finger length and appeal, one doesn’t always result in the different.

Keep tuned in for lots more frivolous conclusions and ridiculous researches from Nick Nadel and TruTV…

excellent company